<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kecek-kecek soal pengharaman buku Islam &#038; Pluralisme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/</link>
	<description>Boleh belaka!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: menj</title>
		<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-1656</link>
		<dc:creator>menj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 03:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-1656</guid>
		<description>Buku "Islam &#38; Pluralisme" memang mengandungi kandungan yang terang-terangan salahnya dan sesatnya golongan Islam Liberal yang mendokong fahaman pluralisme agama (yang secara ringkasnya menekankan bahawa semua agama adalah sama taraf) tetapi saya setuju bahawa mengharamkan buku ini bukanlah caranya untuk menangani ideologi yang terkandung di dalamnya.

- MENJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buku &#8220;Islam &amp; Pluralisme&#8221; memang mengandungi kandungan yang terang-terangan salahnya dan sesatnya golongan Islam Liberal yang mendokong fahaman pluralisme agama (yang secara ringkasnya menekankan bahawa semua agama adalah sama taraf) tetapi saya setuju bahawa mengharamkan buku ini bukanlah caranya untuk menangani ideologi yang terkandung di dalamnya.</p>
<p>- MENJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yati</title>
		<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-1603</link>
		<dc:creator>Yati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 07:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-1603</guid>
		<description>Dear friends,

Sisters in Islam (SIS) is taking part in the 1st KL Alternative Bookfest (KLAB) which will be held on the weekend of 3-4 May at The Annexe, Central Market. The KLAB is a space for small, independent publishers (like SIS) to sell, launch and discuss books. Apart from the SIS booth at the KLAB, we are also hosting a discussion on book banning.   


Details of the event are as follows: 


Wacana on Book Banning: Readers Want Answers 


Date          : May 3, 2008
Time          : 4.00 -- 6.00pm
Venue        : The Annexe, Central Market


Presenters  : 
V. Gayathry (Centre for Independent Journalism) 
Astora Jabat (bekas ketua pengarang Al-Islam dan bekas kolumnis soal jawab agama di Utusan Malaysia)
Norhayati Kaprawi (Sisters In Islam) 
Representative from Home Ministry (to be confirmed)

Each presenter is given 15 minutes and we hope their input will spark a lively discussion from the floor. Input can be either in Bahasa Malaysia or English. 

Join us in this discussion as we scrutinise the history of book banning, including in the Muslim world, and consider the political, social and theological currents behind this form of censorship, especially in Malaysia. We hope to bring together publishers, writers (including those who have been banned), bloggers, journalists, and most importantly, readers and lovers of books. 

There is limited seating so please register with Mala at 03-7785 6121. We look forward to seeing you there!


Sisters in Islam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear friends,</p>
<p>Sisters in Islam (SIS) is taking part in the 1st KL Alternative Bookfest (KLAB) which will be held on the weekend of 3-4 May at The Annexe, Central Market. The KLAB is a space for small, independent publishers (like SIS) to sell, launch and discuss books. Apart from the SIS booth at the KLAB, we are also hosting a discussion on book banning.   </p>
<p>Details of the event are as follows: </p>
<p>Wacana on Book Banning: Readers Want Answers </p>
<p>Date          : May 3, 2008<br />
Time          : 4.00 &#8212; 6.00pm<br />
Venue        : The Annexe, Central Market</p>
<p>Presenters  :<br />
V. Gayathry (Centre for Independent Journalism)<br />
Astora Jabat (bekas ketua pengarang Al-Islam dan bekas kolumnis soal jawab agama di Utusan Malaysia)<br />
Norhayati Kaprawi (Sisters In Islam)<br />
Representative from Home Ministry (to be confirmed)</p>
<p>Each presenter is given 15 minutes and we hope their input will spark a lively discussion from the floor. Input can be either in Bahasa Malaysia or English. </p>
<p>Join us in this discussion as we scrutinise the history of book banning, including in the Muslim world, and consider the political, social and theological currents behind this form of censorship, especially in Malaysia. We hope to bring together publishers, writers (including those who have been banned), bloggers, journalists, and most importantly, readers and lovers of books. </p>
<p>There is limited seating so please register with Mala at 03-7785 6121. We look forward to seeing you there!</p>
<p>Sisters in Islam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fadz</title>
		<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator>fadz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 04:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>wah, menarik ni. Saya diberi oleh Jimadie sebuah buku ini, tak sempat nak baca, adik saya dari Indonesia sudah cilok. Saya suruh dia ulas, tak tahu ceritanya sekarang. Tetapi beliau memberitahu, buku itu memang tulisan (pengantar atau apa) seorang liberalis di Indonesia. Liberalis senang berkancang maju di Indonesia kerana etika pancasila mereka membuka budaya perkahwinan yang sangat terbuka antara agama (pihak agama mereka yang kebanyakannya ahli NU tidak ada kuasa dalam pengubahan dasar walaupun NU kuat di sana). Ya, buku ini harus dibaca dan dicari, sebagai ahl sunnah, mengikut aqidah Assari dan mazhab fiqh Syafiee, apa yang tidak kena dari konteks itu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wah, menarik ni. Saya diberi oleh Jimadie sebuah buku ini, tak sempat nak baca, adik saya dari Indonesia sudah cilok. Saya suruh dia ulas, tak tahu ceritanya sekarang. Tetapi beliau memberitahu, buku itu memang tulisan (pengantar atau apa) seorang liberalis di Indonesia. Liberalis senang berkancang maju di Indonesia kerana etika pancasila mereka membuka budaya perkahwinan yang sangat terbuka antara agama (pihak agama mereka yang kebanyakannya ahli NU tidak ada kuasa dalam pengubahan dasar walaupun NU kuat di sana). Ya, buku ini harus dibaca dan dicari, sebagai ahl sunnah, mengikut aqidah Assari dan mazhab fiqh Syafiee, apa yang tidak kena dari konteks itu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sender</title>
		<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>sender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-904</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Book ban: The two faces of Islam Hadhari&lt;/b&gt; 
By: Ismail Che Yahaya (Malaysiakini.com, Feb 11, 2008)

On Jan 29, the Malaysian government banned 11 books, one of them The Two Faces of Islam: Saudi Fundamentalism and Its Role in Terrorism authored by Stephen Schwartz, a Muslim convert. 

Schwartz suggested that ‘Saudi-Wahhabi agents’ in Malaysia had become alarmed by the publication of the book in Bahasa Indonesia, Dua Wajah Islam. 

In a protest statement against the Malaysian ban, Schwartz commented: ‘It’s contemptible and, frankly, reveals the backward-looking attitudes of authorities in Malaysia, a country which prides itself on its alleged modernisation as an economic tiger. 

‘In reality, books cannot be banned today. They are smuggled, pirated – especially in Southeast Asia – downloaded, and, in the case of my book, can easily be imported from Indonesia and read by Malaysians who do not know English’.

Regardless of Schwartz’s wild guess, book banning in Malaysia of late has gone beyond ‘Saudi- Wahhabi agents’. 

Before The Two Faces of Islam, the Internal Security Ministry banned four titles on religious fundamentalism over two years. 

They are: Islamic Fundamentalism since 1945 (banned 07 June 2007), Feminism and Islamic Fundamentalism: The Limits of Postmodern Analysis (26 April 2007), The Battle for God: Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam (8 June 2006) and, A Fundamental Fear: Eurocentrism and The Emergence of Islamism (8 June 2006). 

See the ministry's full list of banned books here.

Islamic fundamentalism is a broad phenomenon, not solely engineered or funded by the Saudi regime. In fact, fundamentalism is no longer a Christian or Muslim political landscape. It has gained currency and inflicted other religions too. 

Karen Armstrong, in her banned book, describes religious fundamentalism of the 20th century as a response to modern, liberal, materialist globalised civilization. She writes: ‘The West has developed an entirely unprecedented and wholly different type of civilisation, so the religious response to it has been unique’.

Religious fundamentalists, she elaborates, ‘have absorbed the pragmatic rationalism of modernity, and, under the guidance of their charismatic leaders, they refine these ‘fundamentals’ so as to create an ideology that provides the faithful with a plan of action’.

Therefore, it is of no surprise that even Buddhism, Sikhism, Hinduism and Confucianism have developed fundamentalist factions. 

That is why I find the banning is so overwhelming in that it shows the ‘two faces’ of Islam Hadhari as formulated by our present prime minister. On one hand, he tries to promote more tolerant, progressive and moderate Islam but on the other hand, his government has time and again banned such scholarly books on fundamentalism. 

Does it mean our government is protecting and nurturing a fundamentalist mindset among Muslims? Has his Islam Hadhari project been infiltrated by fundamentalist elements in his bureaucracy?

Source: http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/77904</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Book ban: The two faces of Islam Hadhari</b><br />
By: Ismail Che Yahaya (Malaysiakini.com, Feb 11, 2008)</p>
<p>On Jan 29, the Malaysian government banned 11 books, one of them The Two Faces of Islam: Saudi Fundamentalism and Its Role in Terrorism authored by Stephen Schwartz, a Muslim convert. </p>
<p>Schwartz suggested that ‘Saudi-Wahhabi agents’ in Malaysia had become alarmed by the publication of the book in Bahasa Indonesia, Dua Wajah Islam. </p>
<p>In a protest statement against the Malaysian ban, Schwartz commented: ‘It’s contemptible and, frankly, reveals the backward-looking attitudes of authorities in Malaysia, a country which prides itself on its alleged modernisation as an economic tiger. </p>
<p>‘In reality, books cannot be banned today. They are smuggled, pirated – especially in Southeast Asia – downloaded, and, in the case of my book, can easily be imported from Indonesia and read by Malaysians who do not know English’.</p>
<p>Regardless of Schwartz’s wild guess, book banning in Malaysia of late has gone beyond ‘Saudi- Wahhabi agents’. </p>
<p>Before The Two Faces of Islam, the Internal Security Ministry banned four titles on religious fundamentalism over two years. </p>
<p>They are: Islamic Fundamentalism since 1945 (banned 07 June 2007), Feminism and Islamic Fundamentalism: The Limits of Postmodern Analysis (26 April 2007), The Battle for God: Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam (8 June 2006) and, A Fundamental Fear: Eurocentrism and The Emergence of Islamism (8 June 2006). </p>
<p>See the ministry&#8217;s full list of banned books here.</p>
<p>Islamic fundamentalism is a broad phenomenon, not solely engineered or funded by the Saudi regime. In fact, fundamentalism is no longer a Christian or Muslim political landscape. It has gained currency and inflicted other religions too. </p>
<p>Karen Armstrong, in her banned book, describes religious fundamentalism of the 20th century as a response to modern, liberal, materialist globalised civilization. She writes: ‘The West has developed an entirely unprecedented and wholly different type of civilisation, so the religious response to it has been unique’.</p>
<p>Religious fundamentalists, she elaborates, ‘have absorbed the pragmatic rationalism of modernity, and, under the guidance of their charismatic leaders, they refine these ‘fundamentals’ so as to create an ideology that provides the faithful with a plan of action’.</p>
<p>Therefore, it is of no surprise that even Buddhism, Sikhism, Hinduism and Confucianism have developed fundamentalist factions. </p>
<p>That is why I find the banning is so overwhelming in that it shows the ‘two faces’ of Islam Hadhari as formulated by our present prime minister. On one hand, he tries to promote more tolerant, progressive and moderate Islam but on the other hand, his government has time and again banned such scholarly books on fundamentalism. </p>
<p>Does it mean our government is protecting and nurturing a fundamentalist mindset among Muslims? Has his Islam Hadhari project been infiltrated by fundamentalist elements in his bureaucracy?</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/77904" rel="nofollow">http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/77904</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Di Sebalik Pengharaman ‘Islam &#38; Pluralisme’ : Bolehland</title>
		<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>Di Sebalik Pengharaman ‘Islam &#38; Pluralisme’ : Bolehland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-869</guid>
		<description>[...] saya bersetuju dengan hujah Tok Mudin yang terdahulu memberikan respon beliau mengenai isu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] saya bersetuju dengan hujah Tok Mudin yang terdahulu memberikan respon beliau mengenai isu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kecek-kecek Tok Mudin 3.0 &#124; Januari dan apa yang aku baca</title>
		<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Kecek-kecek Tok Mudin 3.0 &#124; Januari dan apa yang aku baca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-866</guid>
		<description>[...] kembali ke topik asal. Selain buku Islam dan Pluralisme yang baru diharamkan, ada tiga lagi buku yang aku baca bulan lalu. Muhammad Abduh: Riwayat Hidup [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kembali ke topik asal. Selain buku Islam dan Pluralisme yang baru diharamkan, ada tiga lagi buku yang aku baca bulan lalu. Muhammad Abduh: Riwayat Hidup [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasbullah bin Pit</title>
		<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-850</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasbullah bin Pit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 13:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-850</guid>
		<description>Orang melayu diajar untuk percaya media perdana bulat2, jadi mereka jarang berfikir untuk mempercayai perkara yang dibaca atau tidak.

itu salah satu punca orang melayu jadi sedikit lemah berfikir sehingga perlu ada pihak nak tolong tapiskan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orang melayu diajar untuk percaya media perdana bulat2, jadi mereka jarang berfikir untuk mempercayai perkara yang dibaca atau tidak.</p>
<p>itu salah satu punca orang melayu jadi sedikit lemah berfikir sehingga perlu ada pihak nak tolong tapiskan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fathi aris omar</title>
		<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>fathi aris omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 21:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Salam, saya sedang mengumpul bahan-bahan di Internet tentang isu pengharaman buku, khususnya yang terkini "Islam &#38; Pluralisme". 

Jika ada catatan blog, surat pembaca, artikel atau ulasan tentang isu ini, sila nyatakan di blog saya. 

Kami juga, yang bergabung bersama Komunite Seni Jalan Telawi (KsJT), mengharapkan sokongan anda dengan cara MENULIS SURAT kepada laman-laman web media, misalnya Malaysiakini.com tentang isu ini. 

Terima kasih. Salam. faomar@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salam, saya sedang mengumpul bahan-bahan di Internet tentang isu pengharaman buku, khususnya yang terkini &#8220;Islam &amp; Pluralisme&#8221;. </p>
<p>Jika ada catatan blog, surat pembaca, artikel atau ulasan tentang isu ini, sila nyatakan di blog saya. </p>
<p>Kami juga, yang bergabung bersama Komunite Seni Jalan Telawi (KsJT), mengharapkan sokongan anda dengan cara MENULIS SURAT kepada laman-laman web media, misalnya Malaysiakini.com tentang isu ini. </p>
<p>Terima kasih. Salam. <a href="mailto:faomar@yahoo.com">faomar@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudin001</title>
		<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>mudin001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Kawe beli juga dewan masyarakat yang terbaru. Baru beli pagi tadi. Belum belek-belek lagi pun. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kawe beli juga dewan masyarakat yang terbaru. Baru beli pagi tadi. Belum belek-belek lagi pun. <img src='http://mudin001.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adihamka</title>
		<link>http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>adihamka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mudin001.com/2008/01/31/kecek-kecek-soal-pengharaman-buku-islam-pluralisme/#comment-839</guid>
		<description>Majalah I majalah wajib kawe tiap2 bulan.

Dewan masyarakat pun kualitinya masih ada walaupun DBP dituduh mandul.. haha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Majalah I majalah wajib kawe tiap2 bulan.</p>
<p>Dewan masyarakat pun kualitinya masih ada walaupun DBP dituduh mandul.. haha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
